Independent editorial resource. Not affiliated with any vendor. Not legal advice. Pricing verified April 2026 from public sources; confirm with vendor.
agenticediscovery.com

eDiscovery pricing models in 2026 -- per GB, per user, per matter, fixed fee

Updated 21 April 2026 | Interactive calculator | Not legal advice

Pricing is the most asked, least clearly answered question in eDiscovery. The 2025-2026 reset changed the landscape: aiR and EverlawAI are now included in base subscriptions, shifting the competitive differentiation from AI capability to overall cost model. Here are the five models explained, three reference matters modelled, and an interactive calculator for your specific matter.

eDiscovery cost estimator

Indicative only. Confirm with each vendor. Last verified April 2026.

10 GB100 TB
1100
1 mo36 mo
PlatformModelEstimated total costNotes
RelativityPer GB$33k-$39kaiR included from early 2026
EverlawPer user$16k-$27kEverlawAI included; data hosting separate
DISCOCustom$30k-$48kIndicative only; contact DISCO for quote
LogikcullPer matter$8k-$15kFlat fee; best value under 200 GB
Nuix NeoPer user + GB$31k-$47kCustom quote; enterprise focus

Estimates exclude processing fees, user licence tiers above standard, hosting rate tiers, and professional services. Relativity and Everlaw costs include base AI features as of early 2026.

The five pricing models explained

Per GB

Primary vendors: Relativity

The producing party pays a monthly fee per gigabyte of data stored in the platform. As the primary pricing dimension, per-GB incentivises early data culling (reducing the population before ingestion lowers costs). Post-2025, Relativity's ~$11-13/GB/month includes aiR. Per-GB is typically better value at high data volumes with relatively few reviewers.

Per user

Primary vendors: Everlaw

The firm pays a fixed annual seat licence per reviewer, plus a separate (lower) data hosting charge. Per-user pricing is typically better value for firms with large review teams relative to data volume, or for firms running multiple concurrent matters on the same platform with the same reviewer pool.

Per matter (flat fee)

Primary vendors: Logikcull

A fixed fee per matter regardless of data volume or review time (up to platform limits). Logikcull pioneered this model. It provides budget certainty for small and mid-size matters; it becomes expensive per GB for very large productions. Best value for single matters under 500 GB.

Hybrid per user + GB

Primary vendors: Nuix, some Reveal tiers

Combines a per-user component with a per-GB data charge. This model distributes cost across both dimensions and can be competitive at mid-range data volumes with mid-range reviewer counts. Nuix Neo uses this model for enterprise contracts.

Service bundle (custom)

Primary vendors: DISCO, Lighthouse, Epiq, Consilio

Platform cost is bundled with professional services (project management, processing, quality control, production). The all-in number is often higher than a platform-only cost, but the total cost of a managed matter may be lower when internal reviewer overhead is factored in. Appropriate for firms without in-house lit-support capability.

Three reference matters modelled

MatterRelativity (per GB)Everlaw (per user)Logikcull (flat)Better choice
500 GB, 8 reviewers, 6 months$33k-$39k$17k-$22k$3.5k-$7kLogikcull if single matter; Everlaw if recurring
5 TB, 25 reviewers, 14 months$770k-$910k$380k-$530kNot applicableEverlaw (per-user advantage at 25 reviewers)
50 TB, 60 reviewers, 24 months$13.2M-$15.6M$8.4M-$12.1MNot applicableRelativity or Nuix (volume discount negotiation)

Indicative. Excludes processing, hosting tiers, and professional services. Last verified April 2026.

Hidden costs to budget for

Updated 2026-04-27